1. 
   Tom

   July 12, 2010 7:49 AM

   The Lake Tulloch options seem very pricey and the washington lake is going to be cold and we are going to have the same problem as the Lake Mayfield with the cold lake.

1. 
   Mike

   July 12, 2010 8:47 AM

   Shasta is the most appealing price wise if we go with that house but we really need to get the boat in the water this summer and go check it out from that aspect. We are planning that now. Tulloch looks much nicer but is more pricey if we go with 2 houses.

1. 
   Marnie

   July 12, 2010 5:02 PM

   My vote goes to Lake Tulloch.

1. 
   StinchFamily

   July 12, 2010 5:09 PM

   I vote one house, hot weather, warm water, and reasonable pricing: Shasta.
   
   adina

1. 
   Kenn

   July 12, 2010 9:37 PM

   I am going to Shasta on 5 August to check out the area.
   We're putting the boat in the water and checkin' it out. I am not sure if the lake below the house is wide enough for the beam on my boat, but, hey, I'll be unbiased and take a look. May just jump across the fingerling of water that comes up that far in the lake.
   
   No, I mean yes, I promise to be unbiased.
   
   Dad

1. 
   Dave

   July 13, 2010 1:32 PM

   I like Waterworld.
   Dave

1. 
   Mom/Barb

   July 13, 2010 3:59 PM

   What??????
   
   One thing to consider on Shasta is that there are only 4 bedrooms with airconditioning. I am pretty sure the outside tent cabins do not have it. There is sleeping in the family room and living room but just wanted to make sure everyone was aware in making the decision. I think we should make the cost less for those taking those outside tent cabins. Another obstacle is that half of the cost is payable at the reservation time. Dad and I do not have that much cash floating around...and it needs to be cash. We could do part but not all..so we need to consider who could contribute to that. (they don't take credit cards)
   
   Love,
   Mom

1. 
   Dave

   July 13, 2010 4:43 PM

   Waterworld=Houseboat. I know I'm out numbered with this one, but I will stand my ground. Those were some good memories....just living out on the water.
   
   Dave

1. 
   Anne and Peter

   July 13, 2010 9:07 PM

   Houseboating is still an option, however, it will cost between $1500 and $2000 for each family.

1. 
   Marnie

   July 13, 2010 10:35 PM

   I'm with David on the Waterworld idea as well if that is still an option.

1. 
   Tom

   July 14, 2010 3:42 AM

   Not sure we are able to swallow the price of the houseboating at that point in our lives.
   
   Tom

1. 
   StinchFamily

   July 14, 2010 7:07 AM

   I don't think the non-air-conditioned tents is an issue. The only time people would be in those is to sleep, and several of us slept outside on the houseboat with no issue related to the heat. It cools off nicely in the evening.

1. 
   Kimberly and Treven

   July 14, 2010 7:07 AM

   Yes, same here Tom. The house boat would be our number one choice, but the price ruins it for us.
   
   Lake Tulloch or the Shasta house are our top choices.

1. 
   Marnie

   July 14, 2010 7:47 AM

   I'm up for whatever. As long as I'm not sleeping in the boat...or a dumpster.

1. 
   Mike

   July 15, 2010 4:47 PM

   http://www.lakesanantonioresort.com/index.html

Post a Comment